<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do CHEWING GUM and ENGINE OIL have in common?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Tomorrow&#039;s world Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bushcamp</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>At a Tom Peters seminar held in London last year he revealed the following data collected in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.

The following are the percentages of purchases influenced by women

Home Furnishings	94%
Financial	89%
Electronics	61%
DIY	80%
Cars	60%
Vacations	92%
Houses	91%
Consumables	83%
Healthcare	80%
Adventure travel &amp; services	80%

In international economic terms, the three largest economies globally are:

The 3 largest economy in the world = USA men
2nd Largest = The entire Japanese population
The largest economy in the world = USA Women

If women make up such a large proportion of the market â€“ why are companies using sex targeted at the male population to sell their products.

Maybe I am missing something here.  I live in a county where there is hardly a product that is not sold using sex (UK).  Even fabric softener is sold using sex.  Are marketers ignoring their customer in a naÃ¯ve and ignorant belief that women have less influence in the choice of purchases or have marketers given up on understanding the female purchasing drivers and are targeting men in an arrogant belief that sex really is their overriding driver for them (or is it an arrogant belief)?

Personally, as a women I find some of the ads offensive, more so when no stretching of my imagination can find a reasonable association between sex and the product.  I think it is demeaning and undermines women.  David Ogilvy is famous for saying â€œyour customer is your wifeâ€?.  When talking to women, treat them with the respect you would expect others to give to your wife or partner.

That said, the use of sex in adverts and marketing campaigns wont stop me purchasing a product unless it has overly offended me, mostly because my purchasing influences are usually more economically driven and possibly because I cant remember what products the sex was attempting to sell.  

However, if marketing campaigns were to start using some sexy male butts or six packs that may changeâ€¦â€¦â€¦..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a Tom Peters seminar held in London last year he revealed the following data collected in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.</p>
<p>The following are the percentages of purchases influenced by women</p>
<p>Home Furnishings	94%<br />
Financial	89%<br />
Electronics	61%<br />
DIY	80%<br />
Cars	60%<br />
Vacations	92%<br />
Houses	91%<br />
Consumables	83%<br />
Healthcare	80%<br />
Adventure travel &amp; services	80%</p>
<p>In international economic terms, the three largest economies globally are:</p>
<p>The 3 largest economy in the world = USA men<br />
2nd Largest = The entire Japanese population<br />
The largest economy in the world = USA Women</p>
<p>If women make up such a large proportion of the market â€“ why are companies using sex targeted at the male population to sell their products.</p>
<p>Maybe I am missing something here.  I live in a county where there is hardly a product that is not sold using sex (UK).  Even fabric softener is sold using sex.  Are marketers ignoring their customer in a naÃ¯ve and ignorant belief that women have less influence in the choice of purchases or have marketers given up on understanding the female purchasing drivers and are targeting men in an arrogant belief that sex really is their overriding driver for them (or is it an arrogant belief)?</p>
<p>Personally, as a women I find some of the ads offensive, more so when no stretching of my imagination can find a reasonable association between sex and the product.  I think it is demeaning and undermines women.  David Ogilvy is famous for saying â€œyour customer is your wifeâ€?.  When talking to women, treat them with the respect you would expect others to give to your wife or partner.</p>
<p>That said, the use of sex in adverts and marketing campaigns wont stop me purchasing a product unless it has overly offended me, mostly because my purchasing influences are usually more economically driven and possibly because I cant remember what products the sex was attempting to sell.  </p>
<p>However, if marketing campaigns were to start using some sexy male butts or six packs that may changeâ€¦â€¦â€¦..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting more and more irritated with ads which insult my intelligence - and there&#039;s rather a lot of them around (which says more about the standard of the ads, or my intelligence?!?). These ads talk down to their viewers - for whatever reason - and it bugs me that they&#039;ve decided their target audience must be brainless and have a really slow grasp on things. I&#039;ll take note of the ones which annoy me most and I&#039;ll post them here...

Btw, the &quot;It&#039;s all good&quot; ad for Good Hope FM is one which should come up for debate. I think they&#039;ve isolated any prospective audience - except for those males for whom being stranded on a tug boat with a lot of scantily-clad models is a great idea (ok, let&#039;s be honest - that&#039;s a lot of guys - including me!). But so what? The ad is almost completely inconsequential because I really can&#039;t see any connection between the advert and what they&#039;re supposed to be advertising...and it does rather demean women - deliberately done, to be sure - but I&#039;m not sure why. What is a woman&#039;s perspective on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting more and more irritated with ads which insult my intelligence &#8211; and there&#8217;s rather a lot of them around (which says more about the standard of the ads, or my intelligence?!?). These ads talk down to their viewers &#8211; for whatever reason &#8211; and it bugs me that they&#8217;ve decided their target audience must be brainless and have a really slow grasp on things. I&#8217;ll take note of the ones which annoy me most and I&#8217;ll post them here&#8230;</p>
<p>Btw, the &#8220;It&#8217;s all good&#8221; ad for Good Hope FM is one which should come up for debate. I think they&#8217;ve isolated any prospective audience &#8211; except for those males for whom being stranded on a tug boat with a lot of scantily-clad models is a great idea (ok, let&#8217;s be honest &#8211; that&#8217;s a lot of guys &#8211; including me!). But so what? The ad is almost completely inconsequential because I really can&#8217;t see any connection between the advert and what they&#8217;re supposed to be advertising&#8230;and it does rather demean women &#8211; deliberately done, to be sure &#8211; but I&#8217;m not sure why. What is a woman&#8217;s perspective on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simone</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>This is such an interesting issue! As a women I 
often wonder what I should think when I see products being 
promoted by scantily clad ladies. Should I be insulted? Should I feel
that women are being &quot;objectified&quot;. Probably. But really it doesn&#039;t bother
me that much to be honest. It&#039;s hardly going to persuade me to buy the 
product in future. It&#039;s like window dressing - or packaging - it&#039;s 
superficial. 
On the flip side of the coin - in a FMCG market where you have such a vast 
array of products to choose from - how do you make yours stand out?
Beauty has always been such a powerful selling point for mankind. As
humans we are attracted to &quot;good looking&quot; - whether that be in the form of
colour, art or even women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting issue! As a women I<br />
often wonder what I should think when I see products being<br />
promoted by scantily clad ladies. Should I be insulted? Should I feel<br />
that women are being &#8220;objectified&#8221;. Probably. But really it doesn&#8217;t bother<br />
me that much to be honest. It&#8217;s hardly going to persuade me to buy the<br />
product in future. It&#8217;s like window dressing &#8211; or packaging &#8211; it&#8217;s<br />
superficial.<br />
On the flip side of the coin &#8211; in a FMCG market where you have such a vast<br />
array of products to choose from &#8211; how do you make yours stand out?<br />
Beauty has always been such a powerful selling point for mankind. As<br />
humans we are attracted to &#8220;good looking&#8221; &#8211; whether that be in the form of<br />
colour, art or even women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 12:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2005/05/28/what-do-chewing-gum-and-engine-oil-have-in-common/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s just a case of doing what you&#039;ve always done with little thought to the issues you&#039;ve raised. I&#039;m sure that their public campaigns do not emply the same strategy of scantily clad women?

Perhaps it&#039;s also an industry (marketing) struggling to renew itself in an environment in which they are under increasing pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just a case of doing what you&#8217;ve always done with little thought to the issues you&#8217;ve raised. I&#8217;m sure that their public campaigns do not emply the same strategy of scantily clad women?</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s also an industry (marketing) struggling to renew itself in an environment in which they are under increasing pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
