Home » General » Currently Reading:

What next? A mini-lawnmower?

September 16, 2005 Mike General 1 Comment

mach3First, there was the MACH3 – one of the 90’s biggest marketing successes, and the flagship of the Gillette range of men’s razors. During its first week on the market, the MACH3 was the No.1 selling razor in the U.S., gaining a 35% over it’s nearest rivals (read more here). Heck, even David Beckham uses one. Needless to say, the MACH3 fast became, and remains, a status symbol in the metrosexual man’s bathroom cabinet.

quattroThen, quite recently, Schick (who have been living in the rather impressive shadow of Gillette for some time now) released their 4-blade Quattro razor, obviously wanting to raise the stakes. The 4-blade Quattro has struggled to even dent the now almost impenetrable brand status built up around the MACH3.

But our friends at Gillette can’t back down on a challenge…

fusionIntroducing the 5-blade (I kid you not) Gillette Fusion Razor. Thanks to Seth’s Blog and Business2Day Blog for the links.

I agree with B2Day – this can only be classified as a gimmick. Do five blades really cut closer than two? Or even one, for that matter? And, to be quiet honest, my wife doesn’t rub up to my cheek like the lady in the ads (nobody else wants to, either), so who’s going to know besides me anyway?

Funny thing is, knowing all this, my MACH3 is already starting to look inadequate…

However, the funniest part of it all comes thanks to an article (sensitive viewers may be disturbed) written at satirist’s paradise ‘The Onion’ on – get this – 11 Oct 2004. Coincidence?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. Nuf Sed says:

    I reckon that we just don’t know it, but Gillette has been purchased in the last 12 months by Microsoft. They are the masters of ‘adding another blade you didn’t need but really good at convincing you, you did”. In fact something unknown to most people, is that if you took Bill Gate’s name and re-configured the letters added a couple, dropped one or two, and you’d be able to spell Gillette. Freaky or what!

    You heard it here first.

Comment on this Article:







Category Drop-Down

Posts about Future Trends

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should

February 9, 2010 Barrie Bramley

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should

My colleague in the UK, Graeme Codrington, posted “3-d TV is here” a week or so back. It’s a short post about Sky News launching 3D TV.  When Graeme writes he’s normally very definite in his opinion, and he’s not scared to put it out there. If you read his 3D TV post, you’ll notice [...]

Will the next generation live to be 1000 years old?

February 8, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

Will the next generation live to be 1000 years old?

Anthony Atala asks, “Can we grow organs instead of transplanting them?” His lab at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine is doing just that — engineering tissues and whole organs (bladders and, soon, kidneys) using smart bio-materials and cutting-edge techniques.
Watch his amazing short video on TED MED
Tweet This Post

CEOs lose faith in strategic planning, they should look to yacht racing for answers

February 2, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

CEOs lose faith in strategic planning, they should look to yacht racing for answers

The Great Recession has made CEOs rethink strategic planning. Walt Shill, head of the North American management consulting practice for Accenture believes that: “Strategy, as we knew it, is dead…Corporate clients decided that increased flexibility and accelerated decision making are much more important than simply predicting the future.”
In my my latest presentation Brave New [...]

Rethinking Marketing and the age of consumer capitalism

January 29, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

Rethinking Marketing and the age of consumer capitalism

In this months Harvard Business Review, Roger Martin writes that “modern capitalism can be broken down into two major eras. The first, managerial capitalism, began in 1932 and was defined by the then radical notion that firms ought to have professional management. The second, shareholder value capitalism, began in 1976. Its governing premise is that [...]

Recent Comments

  • Barrie: I don't know if you picked this article up? It's from FastCo...
  • Vicky Coats: Dean, u should read Playing the Enemy by John Carlin. its th...
  • TR55: Interesting blog, but it’s missing an important part of the...
  • Barrie Bramley: Nice thoughts and observations Yas. Thanks. Good week to you...
  • Barrie Bramley: Great example. A very similar one in concept is the wedding...

Archives