• Don’t miss the 7th annual Loyalty World conference We’re very excited to announce that TomorrowToday has teamed up...
  • Conferences of the future – more online / more connecting New and ever improving telecommunication technologies have improved how we...
  • Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin." /> TomorrowToday's Blog » Blog Archive » Why your conference sucks

    Home » Innovation » Currently Reading:

    Why your conference sucks

    November 18, 2005 Barrie Bramley Innovation No Comments

    Ok. I should have said, “Why your (and sometimes our) conferences suck” – it would have been less direct, but also long and boring. Now I have your attention.

    Companies spend hovels of cash on conferneces, seminars, summits – call it what you like. You’ve been to hundreds, and it’s always the same…

    Tables lined up in parallel rows, chairs evenly spaced apart. Pencil, notebook, businesscard, empty glass tumbler (with mandatory jug of ice water), and the bowl of assorted mints / sweets. Endearmints if you’re lucky. Flipchart and markers in the corner. Some guys stands up, switches to his first PowerPoint slide, and almost simultaneously, you switch off. Finally, as Anne and Fiona so politely put it, you leave with nothing.

    sethSeth Godin
    , marketing guru and uber-blogger of note, recently published a post entitled “How to Run a Useless Conference“.

    In it, he laments the reality of an depressive, global corporate seminar dullness, and offers some insights as to how we can all improve the seminar experience for customers and staff alike. His message? Simple, be atypical.

    How to Run a Useless Conference

    I go to more conferences than you do.

    I’m frequently amazed, but not particularly surprised, at what a bad job conferences do at their stated objective. What’s the problem? After all, these are expensive, professionally-run events that work hard to satisfy the typical attendee.

    And that, of course, is the problem.

    Facts don’t change people’s behavior.

    Emotion changes people’s behavior.

    Stories and irrational impulses are what change behavior. Not facts or bullet points.

    If all we need is facts, then books alone would be sufficient.

    When the Surgeon General announced that smoking was fatal, how many smokers quit right away?

    Human beings are irrational. Change agents (like you) can fight that and obsess about presenting more and more facts, or we can embrace it and make change happen.

    bellcConferences are designed to get average people to change their behavior. By “average�, I mean typical—the masses, the center of the bell curve. That’s a sensible objective. By definition, most people (in any given population) are in the middle of that bell curve. Change them and you’re golden.
    Bellcurve
    If this group would learn, take action and make things happen with just a memo, you wouldn’t need to have a conference. But we end up being flown on average planes to average hotels to sit in average conference rooms and hear average speakers doing presentations filled with bullet points. And it’s all beyond reproach.

    But it doesn’t work.

    It doesn’t work when you’re on a sales call either. Your facts and your service and your prices can be the best, but that doesn’t mean you’ll get the sale. And it breaks down at an annual review and it even happens in a one-on-one encounter with a policeman or a teacher or a clerk.

    People are irrational and they usually make decisions that have nothing to do with facts. And yet we spend most of our time improving our facts and very little concerned with the rest.

    Think about the most powerful learning moments you’ve ever had. My guess is that they didn’t take place in a darkened meeting room.

    Conference organizers (and more important, their clients) spend virtually all of their time and money doing one of two things:
    1. Satisfying the center of the bell curve.
    2. Avoiding failure

    That’s why the typical conference is… typical.

    That’s why the food and the setting and the venue and the location and the chairs and the layout and the schedule and the refreshment breaks are… typical.

    If you want to run a meeting (a brainstorming meeting, a board meeting, a zoning commission meeting) that is likely to perform as well as your past meetings, then the best thing to do is to run it the way you’ve always been running it, right?

    Here’s the challenge, then: figure out how to do the atypical. How to change the interactions that people have with each other. How to change what they talk about in the elevator. How to create an environment where people walk in ready to learn and change and challenge, as opposed to getting that, “hey we’re in the Bahamas let’s get drunk and then sit through a session with the CEO� glazed look.

    Sure, it won’t work on everyone. But that’s better than working on no one.

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

    Related posts:

    1. Don’t miss the 7th annual Loyalty World conference We’re very excited to announce that TomorrowToday has teamed up...
    2. Conferences of the future – more online / more connecting New and ever improving telecommunication technologies have improved how we...

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Comment on this Article:







    Category Drop-Down

    Posts about Future Trends

    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should

    February 9, 2010 Barrie Bramley

    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should

    My colleague in the UK, Graeme Codrington, posted “3-d TV is here” a week or so back. It’s a short post about Sky News launching 3D TV.  When Graeme writes he’s normally very definite in his opinion, and he’s not scared to put it out there. If you read his 3D TV post, you’ll notice [...]

    Will the next generation live to be 1000 years old?

    February 8, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

    Will the next generation live to be 1000 years old?

    Anthony Atala asks, “Can we grow organs instead of transplanting them?” His lab at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine is doing just that — engineering tissues and whole organs (bladders and, soon, kidneys) using smart bio-materials and cutting-edge techniques.
    Watch his amazing short video on TED MED
    Tweet This Post

    CEOs lose faith in strategic planning, they should look to yacht racing for answers

    February 2, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

    CEOs lose faith in strategic planning, they should look to yacht racing for answers

    The Great Recession has made CEOs rethink strategic planning. Walt Shill, head of the North American management consulting practice for Accenture believes that: “Strategy, as we knew it, is dead…Corporate clients decided that increased flexibility and accelerated decision making are much more important than simply predicting the future.”
    In my my latest presentation Brave New [...]

    Rethinking Marketing and the age of consumer capitalism

    January 29, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

    Rethinking Marketing and the age of consumer capitalism

    In this months Harvard Business Review, Roger Martin writes that “modern capitalism can be broken down into two major eras. The first, managerial capitalism, began in 1932 and was defined by the then radical notion that firms ought to have professional management. The second, shareholder value capitalism, began in 1976. Its governing premise is that [...]

    Recent Comments

    • Barrie: I don't know if you picked this article up? It's from FastCo...
    • Vicky Coats: Dean, u should read Playing the Enemy by John Carlin. its th...
    • TR55: Interesting blog, but it’s missing an important part of the...
    • Barrie Bramley: Nice thoughts and observations Yas. Thanks. Good week to you...
    • Barrie Bramley: Great example. A very similar one in concept is the wedding...

    Archives