<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Faces of Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Tomorrow&#039;s world Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-85447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/#comment-85447</guid>
		<description>I was just taking a look at your â€œ&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomorrowtoday.biz/innovation/invitational-innovation.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Invitational Innovation&lt;/a&gt;â€œ link. It seems to me, some people are good at identifying problems. Others are better at solutions. Some can do a bit of both. It seems to me that with more &quot;inclusiveness&quot; -- that is, putting the problems out there where anyone can see them -- then more solutions would be found.

BTW, I could immediately see my personality type: &lt;strong&gt;The Cross-Pollinator&lt;/strong&gt;. I&#039;ll have to read a bit more about this personality list to better see how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just taking a look at your â€œ<a href="http://www.tomorrowtoday.biz/innovation/invitational-innovation.html" rel="nofollow">Invitational Innovation</a>â€œ link. It seems to me, some people are good at identifying problems. Others are better at solutions. Some can do a bit of both. It seems to me that with more &#8220;inclusiveness&#8221; &#8212; that is, putting the problems out there where anyone can see them &#8212; then more solutions would be found.</p>
<p>BTW, I could immediately see my personality type: <strong>The Cross-Pollinator</strong>. I&#8217;ll have to read a bit more about this personality list to better see how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Roesler</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-79030</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Roesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2007/04/22/ten-faces-of-innovation/#comment-79030</guid>
		<description>I like what I see here, and this is the reason:

In my consulting work with companies over the years, I&#039;ve experienced a You-Are-An-Innovator-Or-Not approach to the issue. While it&#039;s obvious to some that different people innovate in different ways--or fill in different pieces of the innovation puzzle--it&#039;s not evident to everyone. 

Thanks for mentioning the book...it looks like both a worthwhile and practical read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what I see here, and this is the reason:</p>
<p>In my consulting work with companies over the years, I&#8217;ve experienced a You-Are-An-Innovator-Or-Not approach to the issue. While it&#8217;s obvious to some that different people innovate in different ways&#8211;or fill in different pieces of the innovation puzzle&#8211;it&#8217;s not evident to everyone. </p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning the book&#8230;it looks like both a worthwhile and practical read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
