Home » Articles » Talent » Currently Reading:

Do You Know Talent?

October 16, 2007 Barrie Bramley Articles, Talent 2 Comments

What is talent, and do you really want it? If so, how much talent do you want, where will you find it and what are you going to do with the talented people you manage to attract to your company? Barrie Bramley turns his attention to these and similar questions, as he helps companies to see talent as their most important competitive differentiator.

Do you know Talent?

By Barrie Bramley

Diversity, Innovation, Six Sigma, Decentralisation, Jack’s 70/20/10, Kai-Zen, Feng Shui. All of these (and others) are strategic focus areas that most companies, either currently or historically, have visited and poured resource and energy into, in order to create a distinctive business value proposition, in order to stand out in the crowded market place they find themselves within. Both internally to ensure the best people, and externally to ensure a healthy bottom line.

I’m not suggesting that companies don’t pick these up and run with them. In today’s business environment everyone’s looking for something to distinguish them from those to the left and right. If you find something that you think can give you an edge, you shouldn’t be criticised for earnestly giving it a go.

A large area of focus at the moment is ‘Talent’. It currently has our attention because of a well-written document titled ‘The War for Talent’. It makes perfect sense. In a globalising world, with a shortage of numbers, in the developed world, and a shortage of skills, in the developing world, it is right to ensure the best possible people inside of your organisation.

I have some questions (to start with), that I think need to be answered for those pursuing the talented:

What is Talent? – There doesn’t seem to be a universally accepted definition as to ‘what talent is’. It seems most people I interact with agree that talent implies individuals who stand out from the crowd. Just how far they need to stand out, or in what area has much fuzziness attached to it.

TomorrowToday has a definition we’ve created having trolled through many other definitions:

“Talented people are defined by their ability to understand the game (rules), master the field of play (environment) by using their equipment and themselves (skills) to go right to the edge – further than anyone else is able to go.”

How many people can we expect to be talented in any one organisation? – Apart from being a fun question to ask a group of people from one organisation in front of each other, the answers vary quite significantly. I’ve had people suggest everyone is talented on one extreme, and only 1% of the group on the other. If one had to look at the sports arena where the concept of talent has been alive for a long time, one is lead to believe that there are levels of talent. Anyone who can complete the Tour de France is certainly talented. But there is only one Lance Armstrong. This applies to golf with Tiger Woods, Grand Prix with Michael Schumacher, Tennis, Swimming, Marathon Running, etc, etc. Perhaps it’s both/and?

How many Talented people do you want?
– I imagine we’d all want a Richard Branson or a Jack Welch working in our business? But how many of them could one organisation handle. How many could one manager manage? Or one leader lead? It is certainly a question you need to answer before you rush out and get one more than you or your organisation can cope with. I imagine just one too many could send you on a fairly destructive journey. Harvard Business Review has dealt with this topic from time to time. The authors of those articles concluded that if you were able to assemble a team full of talented people, it would need to be for a short and defined period of time.

Do you know Talent when see it? – This is the million dollar question. When you’re sitting looking at a team of people, or even just one, how do you know the potential of the person/people you’re looking at? It’s a question we at TomorrowToday are often asked. I imagine it’s contributing a fair amount of pressure and stress on those responsible for finding talent, and then investing time, energy and resource into developing the identified talent.

I wonder, however, if the debate is focussed in the wrong space? What if business stopped investing big chunks of time, energy and resource on finding, retaining and getting the best from ‘talent’, and instead constructed amazing places to work, no matter where their people fell on the continuum of ‘talent’? What if they allocated more time to understanding this new kind of worker in this new kind of workplace? What if adapting the entire organisation for everyone was a more efficient and effective way to have great people lining up for interviews, and investing a fair chunk of who they are into making the said organisation great?

So what would that look like? Next issue of this e-zine I’ll explore thoughts down that road of thinking.

Barrie Bramley is TomorrowToday.biz’s talent expert, and chief creative officer. Barrie spends most of his time helping companies understand the many issues related to talent acquisition, retention, creation and development. He can be contacted at barrie@tomorrowtoday.biz

Related posts:

  1. Talent – Manage it by measuring it My husband is gets really annoyed that I don’t...
  2. The Talent Reboot THE WORD “TALENT” HAS GIVEN BUSINESS A BAD NAME! The...
  3. Shouldn’t we all just pick another word? I’m referring to the word ‘talent’ when I ask this...
  4. A Talent Exodus ahead? Surviving the upturn I am becoming increasingly concerned for my top corporate clients....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Frik says:

    Instead of looking for talent (which is continuous) companies should rather look after their current talent. It is cheaper to engage with your people in order to improve commitment and increase productivity. Happy people would probably stay. Managers should drive this and not HR.

  2. Horst says:

    I have always said: If you do not re-recruit your best people, somebody else will!!

Comment on this Article:







Subscribe to this blog

Subscribe

Category Drop-Down

Posts about Technology Trends

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

March 20, 2010 Graeme Codrington

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

The 11 March 2010 edition of the TIME magazine had a great cover article on “10 ideas for the next 10 years“. In the same edition, Nancy Gibbs (who has often written on generational issues for TIME), wrote an interesting short piece on how young people perceive the generation gap these days. It’s [...]

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

March 17, 2010 Graeme Codrington

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

A report under this title appeared in the New York Times on 12 March 2010. It’s a great example of a few things, but especially of the power of social media, and the fact that innovation (and competition) can come from anywhere these days.
Read the story of how technology developed in the aftermath of [...]

The future of money

March 12, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

The future of money

For years banks and credit card companies have held a strangle hold over the movement of money and charged exorbitant rates for doing so. Now this is changing and fast.
Michale Ivey the founder of Twitpay has devised a system, using code that PayPal made available to him, that allows people to make payments [...]

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

March 5, 2010 Barrie Bramley

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

In the last few hours the 10 billionth tweet was tweeted on Twitter. As one would imagine there was all kinds of hype and excitement, as Tweeps with the necesary skills attempted to predict the time it would happen, and I imagine even be ‘the one’?
My last tweet was 9999989724. Wild. Will be at 10 [...]

Recent Comments

  • Graeme Codrington: From: http://philippschaefer.posterous.com/the-participa...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here is an example of how social media changes the power rel...
  • stace: lazy and sensationalist - I couldn't agree more...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here's another example - a company that developed software t...
  • Graeme Codrington: I agree with you on this point, Barrie. BUT... I just had a...

Archives

Tweet Blender

workforcetrends: 41 Amazing #Pictures of Pollution in #China http://ow.ly/Diy9 (via @GWPStudio @Flipbooks) #Environment #green
1 hour ago
workforcetrends: Why Businesses Don’t Experiment ) - http://bit.ly/dDfita by @danariely in HBR (via @ariegoldshlager @gregkrauska)
1 hour ago
barriebramley: Getting married for the second time is the triumph of Hope over Experience' Charles Saatchi (via @kojobaffoe @Brendan_l)
4 hours ago
barriebramley: @702land what's @YoTwits? Headlines without links. Does anyone think this is useful? I find it anoying
4 hours ago
barriebramley: @MelanieMinnaar - Nice pause. Nice reply : )
4 hours ago
barriebramley: LMAO RT @_ShoN: I love U, I love U, I love U. Don't get me wrong, I love other letters also (via @LisaTroy)
4 hours ago
barriebramley: Family waiting lunch. Youngster playing game on mobile. Man on knees praying to Allah. Young woman hot pants swimming. Rustenburg. New SA :)
6 hours ago
barriebramley: @gregnietsky @brendan_l @clivesimpkins - why do people who say they 'grew up in the Church' never seem to see themselves as part of it?
6 hours ago