Home » Articles » Talent » Currently Reading:

Do You Know Talent?

October 16, 2007 Barrie Bramley Articles, Talent 2 Comments

What is talent, and do you really want it? If so, how much talent do you want, where will you find it and what are you going to do with the talented people you manage to attract to your company? Barrie Bramley turns his attention to these and similar questions, as he helps companies to see talent as their most important competitive differentiator.

Do you know Talent?

By Barrie Bramley

Diversity, Innovation, Six Sigma, Decentralisation, Jack’s 70/20/10, Kai-Zen, Feng Shui. All of these (and others) are strategic focus areas that most companies, either currently or historically, have visited and poured resource and energy into, in order to create a distinctive business value proposition, in order to stand out in the crowded market place they find themselves within. Both internally to ensure the best people, and externally to ensure a healthy bottom line.

I’m not suggesting that companies don’t pick these up and run with them. In today’s business environment everyone’s looking for something to distinguish them from those to the left and right. If you find something that you think can give you an edge, you shouldn’t be criticised for earnestly giving it a go.

A large area of focus at the moment is ‘Talent’. It currently has our attention because of a well-written document titled ‘The War for Talent’. It makes perfect sense. In a globalising world, with a shortage of numbers, in the developed world, and a shortage of skills, in the developing world, it is right to ensure the best possible people inside of your organisation.

I have some questions (to start with), that I think need to be answered for those pursuing the talented:

What is Talent? – There doesn’t seem to be a universally accepted definition as to ‘what talent is’. It seems most people I interact with agree that talent implies individuals who stand out from the crowd. Just how far they need to stand out, or in what area has much fuzziness attached to it.

TomorrowToday has a definition we’ve created having trolled through many other definitions:

“Talented people are defined by their ability to understand the game (rules), master the field of play (environment) by using their equipment and themselves (skills) to go right to the edge – further than anyone else is able to go.”

How many people can we expect to be talented in any one organisation? – Apart from being a fun question to ask a group of people from one organisation in front of each other, the answers vary quite significantly. I’ve had people suggest everyone is talented on one extreme, and only 1% of the group on the other. If one had to look at the sports arena where the concept of talent has been alive for a long time, one is lead to believe that there are levels of talent. Anyone who can complete the Tour de France is certainly talented. But there is only one Lance Armstrong. This applies to golf with Tiger Woods, Grand Prix with Michael Schumacher, Tennis, Swimming, Marathon Running, etc, etc. Perhaps it’s both/and?

How many Talented people do you want?
– I imagine we’d all want a Richard Branson or a Jack Welch working in our business? But how many of them could one organisation handle. How many could one manager manage? Or one leader lead? It is certainly a question you need to answer before you rush out and get one more than you or your organisation can cope with. I imagine just one too many could send you on a fairly destructive journey. Harvard Business Review has dealt with this topic from time to time. The authors of those articles concluded that if you were able to assemble a team full of talented people, it would need to be for a short and defined period of time.

Do you know Talent when see it? – This is the million dollar question. When you’re sitting looking at a team of people, or even just one, how do you know the potential of the person/people you’re looking at? It’s a question we at TomorrowToday are often asked. I imagine it’s contributing a fair amount of pressure and stress on those responsible for finding talent, and then investing time, energy and resource into developing the identified talent.

I wonder, however, if the debate is focussed in the wrong space? What if business stopped investing big chunks of time, energy and resource on finding, retaining and getting the best from ‘talent’, and instead constructed amazing places to work, no matter where their people fell on the continuum of ‘talent’? What if they allocated more time to understanding this new kind of worker in this new kind of workplace? What if adapting the entire organisation for everyone was a more efficient and effective way to have great people lining up for interviews, and investing a fair chunk of who they are into making the said organisation great?

So what would that look like? Next issue of this e-zine I’ll explore thoughts down that road of thinking.

Barrie Bramley is TomorrowToday.biz’s talent expert, and chief creative officer. Barrie spends most of his time helping companies understand the many issues related to talent acquisition, retention, creation and development. He can be contacted at barrie@tomorrowtoday.biz

Related posts:

  1. Talent – Manage it by measuring it My husband is gets really annoyed that I don’t...
  2. The Talent Reboot THE WORD “TALENT” HAS GIVEN BUSINESS A BAD NAME! The...
  3. Shouldn’t we all just pick another word? I’m referring to the word ‘talent’ when I ask this...
  4. A Talent Exodus ahead? Surviving the upturn I am becoming increasingly concerned for my top corporate clients....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Frik says:

    Instead of looking for talent (which is continuous) companies should rather look after their current talent. It is cheaper to engage with your people in order to improve commitment and increase productivity. Happy people would probably stay. Managers should drive this and not HR.

  2. Horst says:

    I have always said: If you do not re-recruit your best people, somebody else will!!

Comment on this Article:







Subscribe to this blog

Subscribe

Category Drop-Down

Posts about Future Trends

Forget creating customer loyalty and focus on building friendships with customers

March 18, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

Forget creating customer loyalty and focus on building friendships with customers

I’m not talking about the glib friendships companies try to encourage by inviting their customers to be friends or fans on Facebook, but rather intimate and deep relationships that come from having a vested interest in the people that make their business possible. I recently came across a study by Michael Argyle and Monika Henderson [...]

You’re going to have to change your management style

March 17, 2010 Barrie Bramley

You’re going to have to change your management style

I spend a large part of my year in conversation with managers working hard to try and understand today’s younger workforce. The pain they’re feeling is palpable. The evidence of change is overwhelming. Making the necessary changes, at times, seems impossible. The hope is that the challenges are being interrogated and slowly but surely acted [...]

A Radical Proposal for Executive Pay

March 15, 2010 Graeme Codrington

A Radical Proposal for Executive Pay

Everyone agrees that something must be done about executive pay. One of the major contentious issues emerging out of the financial crisis is the way that senior executives and manager, especially in the financial industries, are remunerated. These days, executive pay often seems to be unrelated to the company’s performance, and in many [...]

The future of money

March 12, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

The future of money

For years banks and credit card companies have held a strangle hold over the movement of money and charged exorbitant rates for doing so. Now this is changing and fast.
Michale Ivey the founder of Twitpay has devised a system, using code that PayPal made available to him, that allows people to make payments [...]

Recent Comments

  • Graeme Codrington: From: http://philippschaefer.posterous.com/the-participa...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here is an example of how social media changes the power rel...
  • stace: lazy and sensationalist - I couldn't agree more...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here's another example - a company that developed software t...
  • Graeme Codrington: I agree with you on this point, Barrie. BUT... I just had a...

Archives

Tweet Blender

workforcetrends: RT @philipp_philipp: The participation economy | By Tim Brown and David Fetherstonhaug | The Economist http://post.ly/TMh2
2 hours ago
barriebramley: What Business Card? Just Scan My QR Code - http://ow.ly/1opB0
5 hours ago
workforcetrends: Amazing! @MichaelHyatt is giving away 50 copies of the NY Times bestseller SWITCH by Chip and Dan Heath: http://bit.ly/8Xs9wF
6 hours ago
workforcetrends: RT @GreenMaven: The 16 People You Must Follow on Twitter for #Green Business | Earth and Industry http://bit.ly/cWAt7s #ff
6 hours ago
workforcetrends: RT @futureaware: Robot Journalist Takes Pictures, Ask Questions, Publishes Online #future http://bit.ly/aNVEVL
6 hours ago
workforcetrends: RT @fastcompany: GM to Use Augmented Reality Tech for Safer Driving http://su.pr/5MzhaS
6 hours ago
workforcetrends: I was just asked if I'll be tweeting "personally" somewhere. No, is the answer. This account is my only twitter feed. Content stays the same
6 hours ago
workforcetrends: My white paper on 'When Social Media Grows Up' (http://tr.im/socialmedia2), is now available as a podcast: http://ow.ly/1onIU
6 hours ago