Home » Ethics » Leadership » Recession solutions » Currently Reading:

Managers, ethics and a commitment for the future

October 17, 2008 Graeme Codrington Ethics, Leadership, Recession solutions No Comments

In the wake of the world financial crisis, the analysis of “what went wrong” has started. Not surprisingly, one of the first groups of people singled out is managers. Here are some excellent thoughts from The Economist and the Harvard Business Review.

First, do no harm

Oct 7th 2008
From Economist.com

Do bosses need their own Hippocratic Oath?

ALREADY the managers of many of the world’s leading financial firms have been found wanting. Now, as the world’s economy slows, attention will turn to managers of non-financial firms, to see if they are any better prepared for the rainy day that was bound to come sooner or later.

It will be no surprise if soaring bankruptcies demonstrate that their risk management was just as inept, and just as focused on maximising short-term profits (and their pay packets) without thinking too hard about what would happen when the good times ended.

Why is this failure so unsurprising? In a new article in the Harvard Business Review, Rakesh Khurana and Nitin Nohria, who teach at the Harvard Business School, argue that the problem is literally a lack of professionalism. Contrasting corporate managers with doctors and lawyers, the authors title their article with their argument: “It’s Time to Make Management a True Profession”.


As they point out, “unlike doctors and lawyers, managers don’t need a formal education, let alone a license, to practice. Nor do they adhere to a universal and enforceable code of conduct.” Even if individual firms write and enforce corporate codes or value statements, “there’s no universally accepted set of professional values backed up by a governing body with the power to censure managers who deviate from the code.”

Implicit in this argument is a deep criticism of the MBA, a degree that Messrs Khurana and Nohria teach, and which many of today’s failing managers hold. Indeed, there are already rumblings about the failure of the MBA courses that Wall Street’s “finest” took before rising up the ranks of global finance—just as there was after Enron went bust in 2001 (Jeffrey Skilling, Enron’s chief executive, holds an MBA from Harvard).

Yet, as the professors point out, the desire to make management a profession like law and medicine was central to Harvard Business School in the first decades after it was founded 100 years ago. A start would be for management education to “adopt the more stringent knowledge and competency standards required by true professions,” they argue. For instance, the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business “could devise and administer an exam that all graduating MBAs would have to pass before they were licensed to practice”. Managers could also be required to take top-up courses to retain their licences.

One question this raises, the authors concede, is just how essential management education is—indeed, the success of iconoclasts like Bill Gates might suggest that a lack of formal management training was a positive advantage in becoming a successful entrepreneur. Medicine and law have far fewer examples of top practitioners succeeding without professional training—despite the popularity of some alternative healers and upstart legal heroes such as Erin Brockovich. Messrs Khurana and Nohria propose that management jobs be classified according to the amount of professional training required in order to allow the market to make clear the value of such training, but it is hard to imagine the traditional entrepreneur educated in the university of life going out of fashion.

Perhaps more important than an educational standard may be a general agreement on what constitutes professional standards of behaviour. To this end, the two professors propose a managerial version of the Hippocratic Oath, to which all doctors must swear. “Codes create and sustain a feeling of community and mutual obligation that members have toward each other and toward the profession,” they argue.

The management oath they propose covers issues including selfishness (“I pledge that considerations of personal benefit will never supersede the interests of the enterprise I am entrusted to manage”) and transparency (“I vow to represent my enterprise’s performance accurately and transparently to all relevant parties”).

This lacks the simple clarity of medicine’s “First, do no harm”, largely because it is exceedingly hard to judge whether a manager is doing a good job until long after he or she has ceased to do it, if even then. The professors want managers to pledge “to serve the public’s interest by enhancing the value [their] enterprise creates for society.” But this is a difficult standard to judge; peers and the public tend to focus on the measure of performance they can see easily: profit.

In business, profit can go up for years even when a manager is overseeing activities that neither maximise the long-term value of the company nor aid society. With the exception of Hugh Laurie’s brilliant but misanthropic fictional doctor, House, going against the norms of the profession is not the route to success in medicine.

Yet, as the public and politicians increasingly look to blame business for the problems of the economy, the call for professionalism could hardly be more timely. If they are wise, today’s business leaders and educators will see it is in their enlightened self-interest to take the goal of professionalisation seriously, and thus start to regain society’s trust.

Source: http://www.economist.com/daily/columns/businessview/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12371968&Fsrc=mgttkgnwl

Related posts:

  1. TIME magazine: The Future of Work I think they do it every other year, and it...
  2. How (not) to do business like Jack Welch Since leaving GE, Jack Welch has refused to retire gracefully...
  3. The future for banks and a better way to pay bankers POSTED 10 November 2009; UPDATED 11 November 2009 One story...
  4. Affirmitive Action is Dead in South Africa – or is it? Sipho Ngcobo wrote an interesting article on Money Web this...
  5. Motivation: Harvard’s ‘powerful new model’ Harvard Business Review’s ’summer reading’ (their big summer edition) has...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Comment on this Article:







Subscribe to this blog

Subscribe

Category Drop-Down

Posts about Technology Trends

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

March 20, 2010 Graeme Codrington

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

The 11 March 2010 edition of the TIME magazine had a great cover article on “10 ideas for the next 10 years“. In the same edition, Nancy Gibbs (who has often written on generational issues for TIME), wrote an interesting short piece on how young people perceive the generation gap these days. It’s [...]

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

March 17, 2010 Graeme Codrington

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

A report under this title appeared in the New York Times on 12 March 2010. It’s a great example of a few things, but especially of the power of social media, and the fact that innovation (and competition) can come from anywhere these days.
Read the story of how technology developed in the aftermath of [...]

The future of money

March 12, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

The future of money

For years banks and credit card companies have held a strangle hold over the movement of money and charged exorbitant rates for doing so. Now this is changing and fast.
Michale Ivey the founder of Twitpay has devised a system, using code that PayPal made available to him, that allows people to make payments [...]

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

March 5, 2010 Barrie Bramley

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

In the last few hours the 10 billionth tweet was tweeted on Twitter. As one would imagine there was all kinds of hype and excitement, as Tweeps with the necesary skills attempted to predict the time it would happen, and I imagine even be ‘the one’?
My last tweet was 9999989724. Wild. Will be at 10 [...]

Recent Comments

  • Graeme Codrington: From: http://philippschaefer.posterous.com/the-participa...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here is an example of how social media changes the power rel...
  • stace: lazy and sensationalist - I couldn't agree more...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here's another example - a company that developed software t...
  • Graeme Codrington: I agree with you on this point, Barrie. BUT... I just had a...

Archives

Tweet Blender

workforcetrends: 41 Amazing #Pictures of Pollution in #China http://ow.ly/Diy9 (via @GWPStudio @Flipbooks) #Environment #green
2 hours ago
workforcetrends: Why Businesses Don’t Experiment ) - http://bit.ly/dDfita by @danariely in HBR (via @ariegoldshlager @gregkrauska)
2 hours ago
barriebramley: Getting married for the second time is the triumph of Hope over Experience' Charles Saatchi (via @kojobaffoe @Brendan_l)
4 hours ago
barriebramley: @702land what's @YoTwits? Headlines without links. Does anyone think this is useful? I find it anoying
4 hours ago
barriebramley: @MelanieMinnaar - Nice pause. Nice reply : )
5 hours ago
barriebramley: LMAO RT @_ShoN: I love U, I love U, I love U. Don't get me wrong, I love other letters also (via @LisaTroy)
5 hours ago
barriebramley: Family waiting lunch. Youngster playing game on mobile. Man on knees praying to Allah. Young woman hot pants swimming. Rustenburg. New SA :)
6 hours ago
barriebramley: @gregnietsky @brendan_l @clivesimpkins - why do people who say they 'grew up in the Church' never seem to see themselves as part of it?
6 hours ago