Home » Future Trends » Generation Y » Generations » Organisational Design » Talent » Currently Reading:

Generation Y studied by Economist Business Intelligence Unit

November 19, 2008 Graeme Codrington Future Trends, Generation Y, Generations, Organisational Design, Talent No Comments

Youth researchOne of the most common criticisms of generational theory is that it is nothing much more than pop psychology. While it is true that many people use generational theory in its crudest forms, applying it when all they know about it is what they heard in a one hour keynote session at a conference, this does not mean that the theory itself has no substance. It is also true that some people use it as a “blunt instrument” – applying it with no regard to other dynamics and segmentation models. Again, just because some people use it badly, doesn’t discredit the theory itself.

There are many formal research projects on generations, and almost all of them confirm the basic theory and its findings. A recent study now focuses on the younger generation, known as Generation Y. The global survey was conducted by the Economist Business Intelligence Unit and Genesys, an Alcatel-Lucent company. It looked at how consumers born between 1982 and 2001 will impact the customer experience, asking C-level and senior executives from around the world how they are creating a customer experience to attract and retain Millennials. Of the 164 executives who took part in the survey, 29% came from North America, 31% from Europe, 30% from Asia-Pacific and 10% from the rest of the world. Participants represented 19 different industries. One-third of respondents’ organisations had annual revenue greater than US$1 billion and just over one-half (51%) had less than US$500 million in revenue. Board members and CEOs comprised 30% of respondents. CFOs, CTOs and other C-level executives made up an additional 19%. The remainder was split among other senior and middle management functions.

The headline results and executive summary of the findings is very interesting:

The Economist BIU found that Generation Y include approximately 80 million individuals born between 1982 and 2001 in the US alone. The millennial generation outnumbers baby boomers today, and its ranks will continue to grow in influence as the majority of Gen Y reach adulthood in the next decade. Largely as a result of the Baby Boomers, executives overwhelmingly agree (81%) that each generation has specific work and marketplace needs, but they are split on which demographic group should receive the greater share of market investment. A surprising 42% believe that a bigger share of investment in marketing and service should go toward catering to Gen Y, while 39% favor older consumers. As a result of this split, the research found few companies have cemented their approach or yet implemented a strategy.

The survey found that 75% of companies believe that in the next three years they will need to have a Gen Y strategy in place, with 30% expecting a major impact that will lead to change across the organisation, and 45% expecting a more modest impact. Despite this, 54% of respondents say they have yet not set their strategy for targeting, attracting, or retaining Gen Y, while 32% say they have done so. For example, most companies have not kept pace with the Gen Yers’ preference for interacting through newer, community-based technologies, as most firms continue to rely on telephone, email and store/office-front points of contact.

The research found the proliferation of blogs, podcasts, videos, chat rooms, social networking sites and other online interactive communication has changed the corporate-customer relationship. In the past, customers tended to go directly to the company to enquire about a product, make a purchase or raise a complaint; today they increasingly go online. On the web, they learn, shop and share their experiences, both positive and negative. The survey identified key features and motivating factors that companies expect to resonate with Gen Y, which revolve around issues such as convenience, customisation, and community. For example, when it comes to purchasing products and services, corporate reputation and brand are less important with the Gen Y than peer recommendation and viral marketing (such as online promotional communications passed from one customer to another). Moreover, respondents say it is convenience more than price that drives millennial purchasing decisions. Others include “fast, reliable service,” “frictionless interaction,” a “tailored approach,” “honesty and trust” and a “personal touch”.

Three key findings emerged:

  1. Investment strategies are shifting to favor Gen Y: companies are debating heavily whether to invest more in catering to aging baby boomers versus next-generation consumers, with 42% saying they should tilt toward younger customers, while 39% would shift toward Baby Boomers and Generation X.

  2. The time to act is now: most companies (54%) have not yet set their strategies or marketing for Gen Y, even though they overwhelmingly agree that such steps are needed, with 75% saying Gen Y will impact their organisation as consumers in the next three years.
  3. It’s an Enterprise 2.0 world: Most companies have a sophisticated understanding of what it would take to adapt, but are not ready to change their customer engagement model by leveraging social networking, peer marketing, better online support, text messaging, and blogging.

The report highlights the urgent need for businesses to invest in new modes of customer communication and to tailor their approaches to match customer preferences. The research is part of an ongoing set of thought leadership initiatives by Genesys designed to help leading enterprises respond to key challenges they face and enable them to improve the overall customer experience.

A complete copy of the research is available upon request by going to http://genesyslabs-registration.com/?p=ECGG to register and download, or email press@genesyslab.com.

Related posts:

  1. VWV Red Plug on Generation 2.0 VWV is an interesting company, that I still don’t know...
  2. Gary Hamel on Generation Y Gary Hamel, the best selling author and global guru on...
  3. After Shock: the five trends disrupting business in the next 5 years Updated in March 2010 (now with an added Executive summary...
  4. The Recession Generation Each generation is defined by the economic experience of its...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Comment on this Article:







Subscribe to this blog

Subscribe

Category Drop-Down

Posts about Technology Trends

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

March 20, 2010 Graeme Codrington

How Gen Y sees the Gen gap

The 11 March 2010 edition of the TIME magazine had a great cover article on “10 ideas for the next 10 years“. In the same edition, Nancy Gibbs (who has often written on generational issues for TIME), wrote an interesting short piece on how young people perceive the generation gap these days. It’s [...]

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

March 17, 2010 Graeme Codrington

Africa’s Gift to Silicon Valley: How to Track a Crisis

A report under this title appeared in the New York Times on 12 March 2010. It’s a great example of a few things, but especially of the power of social media, and the fact that innovation (and competition) can come from anywhere these days.
Read the story of how technology developed in the aftermath of [...]

The future of money

March 12, 2010 Dean van Leeuwen

The future of money

For years banks and credit card companies have held a strangle hold over the movement of money and charged exorbitant rates for doing so. Now this is changing and fast.
Michale Ivey the founder of Twitpay has devised a system, using code that PayPal made available to him, that allows people to make payments [...]

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

March 5, 2010 Barrie Bramley

Twitter 10 Billion – quality not quantity

In the last few hours the 10 billionth tweet was tweeted on Twitter. As one would imagine there was all kinds of hype and excitement, as Tweeps with the necesary skills attempted to predict the time it would happen, and I imagine even be ‘the one’?
My last tweet was 9999989724. Wild. Will be at 10 [...]

Recent Comments

  • Graeme Codrington: From: http://philippschaefer.posterous.com/the-participa...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here is an example of how social media changes the power rel...
  • stace: lazy and sensationalist - I couldn't agree more...
  • Graeme Codrington: Here's another example - a company that developed software t...
  • Graeme Codrington: I agree with you on this point, Barrie. BUT... I just had a...

Archives

Tweet Blender

DeanvanLeeuwen: Paragliding across the Himalayas using iphones to tell everyone about their Odyssey http://ow.ly/1pd6W
14 minutes ago
DeanvanLeeuwen: March 22, 1995: Longest Human Space Adventure Ends http://ow.ly/1pd5n
18 minutes ago
DeanvanLeeuwen: Five Things Palm can do to win the smartphone war against iPad http://ow.ly/1pd1e
24 minutes ago
DeanvanLeeuwen: 10 rules for effective strategic planning PLUS one more http://ow.ly/1oESg
7 hours ago
workforcetrends: RT @loopdiloop: Customized ads on Facebook seem creepy not endearing http://ow.ly/1p7ef
9 hours ago
DeanvanLeeuwen: Talent is destroying shareholder value and giving businesses a bad name. Discover how to reboot your talent http://ow.ly/1oEML
10 hours ago
workforcetrends: 41 Amazing #Pictures of Pollution in #China http://ow.ly/Diy9 (via @GWPStudio @Flipbooks) #Environment #green
16 hours ago
workforcetrends: Why Businesses Don’t Experiment ) - http://bit.ly/dDfita by @danariely in HBR (via @ariegoldshlager @gregkrauska)
16 hours ago