Where Leaders of Talent Get Their Edge
A business colleague, Julien Salvi, owns an excellent company, Teneo, that runs European talent management and employee engagement conferences. You can see details at their website – especially see their upcoming conference on employee engagement.
He sent me the following information recently. It’s really interesting what some top talent managers are focusing on at the moment.
Julien moderated a panel of senior talent development officers representing three very different industries and diverse geographies: Deb Wheelock of Mercer (a high-end professional services firm, recruiting highly educated knowledge workers), Pamela Stroko of The Gap (a retailer faced with the classic industry challenges of creating a differentiating employee proposition and enhancing retention of its large workforce), and Sujaya Banerjee of the Essar Group (a diversified India-based enterprise participating in a variety of industrial sectors, including steel, energy, and communications).
Julien reports that even with this diversity of perspectives, they found their views on today’s top talent challenges to be surprisingly aligned. Here are their ten top views:
1. Attracting and retaining enough employees at all levels to meet the needs of organic and inorganic growth. All three companies are facing a talent crunch. Essar, for example, has grown from 20 thousand employees to a staggering 60 thousand in the past 3 years. Fifty-five percent of their employees have less than two years of tenure.
2. Creating a value proposition that appeals to multiple generations. With four generations in today’s workplace, most companies are struggling to create an employee experience that appeals to individuals with diverse needs, preferences and assumptions. The Gap, for example, has 153,000 people in its workforce. The stores have a high percentage of Gen Y employees, while corporate roles and leadership ranks are primarily made up of Gen X’ers and Boomers. How does one create a compelling employee value proposition for the organization?
3. Developing a robust leadership pipeline. I believe one of the biggest potential threats to many corporations is a lack of a robust talent pool from which to select future leaders. This is in part a numbers issue—the Gen X cohort is small and therefore, as I like to say, precious. But it’s also an interest issue—many members of Gen X are simply not particularly excited about being considered for these roles. There was wide agreement among the panelists that a lack of individuals ready to move into senior client manager and leadership roles is a critical challenge.
4. Rounding out the capabilities of hires who lack the breadth of necessary for global leadership. It’s relatively straightforward to identify and assess experts in specific functional or technical arenas, but much more difficult to determine whether those individuals have the people skills, leadership capabilities, business breadth, and global diversity sensibilities required for the nature of leadership today. Increasingly, the challenge of developing these broader skill sets falls to the corporations. Essar has formed an academy specifically to develop and groom its own leaders.
5. Transferring key knowledge and relationships. The looming retirement of a significant portion of the workforce challenges all companies, but particularly those who are dependant on the strength of tacit knowledge, such as that embedded in customer relationships, a key to Mercer’s business success.
6. Stemming the exodus of Gen X’ers from corporate life. A big threat in many firms today is the exodus of mid-career talent—people in whom the organization has invested heavily and in whom it has pinned it hopes for future leadership. For example, developing talent management practices and programs calibrated to leverage technology and create greater work/life balance has been a priority for Mercer over recent years.
7. Redesigning talent management practices to attract and retain Gen Y’s. The challenge of calibrating talent management practices and programs to attract and engage our young entrants is critically important to all firms and particularly so for firms that depend on a strong flow of top talent, such professional service firms like Mercer. All three panelists agreed that making the business infrastructure more attractive to Gen Y is a high priority.
8. Creating a workplace that is open to Boomers in their “second careers.” Age prejudice still exists, but smart companies are looking for ways to incorporate the talents of Boomers and even older workers in the workforce. In many cases, this requires rethinking roles and work relationships.
9. Overcoming a “norm” of short tenure and frequent movement. Some industries, such as specialty retail, are known for having a very disposable view of talent. Companies intent on changing that norm, such as The Gap, must address both external influences in the marketplace and an internal mindset. The Gap believes retaining employees in roles for 3+ years will be a key to their future earnings growth.
10. Enlisting executives who don’t appreciate the challenge. Many talent executives complain that business leaders still believe that people are lined up outside the door because of the power of the company’s brand. The challenge of enlisting the support of all executives for the transition from a talent culture that has traditionally operated with a “buy” strategy to one that places more emphasis on “build” is widely shared.
Provided by Harvard Business—Where Leaders Get Their Edge
Related posts:
- Talent is a Four Letter Word The title of this post comes from a reply to...
- A Talent Exodus ahead? Surviving the upturn I am becoming increasingly concerned for my top corporate clients....
- The Challenge for New Leaders Before a new era can come into being, there must...
- Good leaders share the pain with their teams This coming year is likely to see continued difficulties in...
- Talent – Manage it by measuring it My husband is gets really annoyed that I don’t...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
I’d argue that point 4 should be depth of leadership and not necessarily breadth. I think there is an over-supply of breadth and under-supply of the required leadership depth required.