For some companies, customers are like onions, full of layers and potential but difficult to identify through watering eyes. For other companies – those with a deep and intimate understanding of their customers – they are like parfait, rich, rewarding and fattening (in a good way) to the bottom line. Discover how Bill Clinton, Shrek and Donkey plus the fishmongers at Seattle Pike Place Fish Market can help you increase revenue and become a more customer centric company. By connecting with people’s value systems you can transform your customers from onions into parfait, and according to Donkey – an authority on the subject – everyone loves parfait!
Through our research, we’ve identified a method of developing marketing campaigns and customer experiences that connect with people’s driving value systems. The results have been exceptional. For one client we increased total company revenues by 300%, for another we increased sales of key product line by over 70%; and for a leading bank we doubled response rates for a direct mail campaign targeting a saturated market. In this article, Dean van Leeuwen, co-founder of TomorrowToday UK, explores how generational and values-focused marketing can assist your business in building stronger relationships that boost sales and retention.
Strategy formation has been elevated to the realm of the MBA. Curriculum is developed, courses are taught and only the chosen few get to play in this elite playground. Here the air is thin and we have come to accept that only those accustomed to flying at high altitude are entitled to be the ones to formulate the strategy. That is just the way it is and so our strategy descends from above, from the gods on high, and our gratitude is mixed with awe as we get to implement what has been commanded.
However, the widespread problem is that some 90% of strategy fails to get implemented within our organizations and so we are forced to ask, ‘why is this the case’?
There may be a host of complex explanations as to why this is the case but here are three simple questions that need to be asked and engaged if strategy is to be successfully implemented. … Continue Reading
Generational theory attempts to explain some of the differences between young and old people, and how they act, react and interact in different environments. Our value systems are shaped by factors such as culture, religion, gender, personality, class and socio-economics. But they are also shaped by the era in which we are born, and moulded by our peers and the world events that define our formative years. But can generational theory apply equally across different cultures and in different countries? Best selling author of “Mind the Gap” and an international, award winning presenter on the issue of the generation gap, Dr Graeme Codrington, provides his personal perspective….
It will probably be useful to you to know some of my credentials right at the start. My company, TomorrowToday is one of the world’s leading generational consultancies. An important part of our suite of services to clients is an understanding of the generation gap. Our approach is based on multiple sources of research and practical application, including access to the originators of generational theory, Neil Howe and William Strauss, who work out of the USA. We have also done our own extensive research, and have access to country-specific data for South Africa, New Zealand, Mauritius, England, Russia, Hungary, Estonia, Iran, Chile, Australia, China, Japan, the USA and an increasing number of other countries. Our application to different countries is constantly expanding as our team of experts is invited to present and consult around the world – in over 20 countries every year. We have presented in over 50 different countries, covering all the continents. … Continue Reading
By Darren Davies, Founder of Integrity Blue Consulting
The global economic downturn has been more than just a recession. It has signaled an era of unprecedented change, and a time of turbulence for organizations, organizational leadership and organizational communication. Robinson and Harvey (2008) observed that the, “acceleration of globalization has created a chaotic state of change as businesses struggle to adapt new paradigms of leadership, in which established tried and tested approaches may no longer be effective.” Critical to navigating through the largely uncharted territory of this new world at work, is the role of communication, and the importance of understanding communication concepts and developments between leaders and followers within this new world.
A basic communication model would define communication as, “a process by which information and understanding are transferred between a sender and a receiver” (Richard Daft, The Leadership Experience, 2008, p. 260). Fundamental to the communication process is the understanding that a message is encoded and sent via a channel (medium or method), to a receiver, who in turn decodes the message, and subsequently encodes a return message via feedback. And so the communication process begins, and continues. Burnland’s (Towards a meaning centered philosophy on communication, 1962, p. 197 – 211) transactional model of communication assumes that messages are being sent and received simultaneously by senders and receivers, and hence the ongoing continuous nature of the process of communication. This basic transactional communication model remains true within our new world; however the information, methods and manners within which these messages are being sent and received, has radically changed. Furthermore, that rate at which information is being communicated, as well as the volume of information being communicated is challenging our traditional understanding of organizational communication, and the role leadership fulfills within the communication process. … Continue Reading
talent seems like a ‘4 letter’ word for U! Seems 2 me you need a sentence. “those dudes with ability to do what you need done.”
His reply captures the essence of my frustration with the word ‘talent’ and the phrase ‘A war for Talent’ (and there are many variables of this phrase floating around on the web). The phrase as far as I can tell gained popularity through the McKinsey marketing effort highlighting the shortage of Gen X in the developed world (1st world, Northern Hemisphere and whatever other insufficient term you have to describe that part of the world) demographic problem of a smaller group of people sitting under the Baby Boomer bubble. From a succession point of view this may result in not enough people (purely numbers, forget qualification and skill) available to replace retiring Boomers. I say ‘may result’ because nobody, as far as I can tell, knows if technology (broadly speaking and including options like outsourcing and off-shoring) is able to fill the void?
In the developing world (Southern Hemisphere, 3rd world) there is a completely different challenge. This part of the world has a far larger younger set of people coming through. Far larger than Baby Boomers. In this context there’s a frustration at the bottom of the demographic pyramid because of the lack of space available higher up in organisation.
TomorrowToday’s blog has been up and running since September 2004. We have over 1750 posts on our blog, filed under 35 different categories. We’ve not done this before, but here are TomorrowToday’s most read blog posts as of 31 December 2009:
So there they are. If there was a writing award in TomorrowToday it would certainly go to Graeme Codrington (based in the UK for now, and traveller of the world) for the most written and the most read. Correlation between the two? Me thinks so.
The 15th September 2008 is a day that shall remain etched in the annals of corporate history. It’s the day that Lehman Brothers went bankrupt lurching the world economy into the biggest financial crisis since the 1930’s. On that day and ensuing months it became clear a number of very talented individuals had brought the world to the brink of financial disaster. It’s a day that talent gave business a bad name. But there is more to the new talent challenge than just the financial crisis. Over the past decade consultants have been convincing companies that there is a “war for talent”. In this war, you have been told that talent needs to be given what it wants and that companies need to go to extraordinary lengths to provide talent with all the flexibility and freedom it desires. Nowhere has the war for talent been more ferociously fought than in the corridors of the financial monoliths. Banks, investment houses and insurance companies have hired and rewarded the very best. In return the brightest of the brightest have devised very clever and innovative financial instruments that brought the world to the brink of collapse. The reasons for the financial crisis are complex, needless to say. But what if the crisis happened not in spite of talent but because of it? What if companies have been using the wrong strategies and tactics to fight the war for talent?
This article argues that talent is crucial for business success, but that the current focus and direction being taken is detrimental to businesses and society. A paradigm shifts is required. We argue that the new talent focus needs to be built on creating talented companies, not creating talented individuals.
Download a copy of this article in PDF format – right click here. The contents of this article can be presented as a keynote or a workshop for your team. Contact our UK or South African offices to find out how.
As the world slowly emerges out of recession over the next few years, it will become increasingly clear that this was more than just an economic downturn. Disruptive forces are significantly reshaping the world of work. Some of these changes have been brewing for a decade or more – and now this recession has exacerbated their influence and speeded up their effects. Companies that have survived the downturn need to shift their focus to surviving the upturn. We are not ever going to “get back to normal” – a new normal is emerging for everyone, everywhere.
Understanding the forces that are driving this disruptive change will give an organisation the insights needed to adjust their systems, structures and methods and gain a significant competitive advantage in the next 3 to 5 years. It is therefore essential to provide not just senior leaders, but all staff throughout your company, with a framework of thinking about this “new normal”. You want them to work together to take advantage of the opportunities that will emerge.
There are at least five key drivers of disruptive change that every organisation in every industry needs to track. These are the T.I.D.E.S. of change. (It’s a corny acronym, I know, but hopefully it will help with both remembering the framework, as well as making it easy to use on a regular basis in team meetings and informal conversations throughout your organisation). Here then are the key drivers of disruptive change in the next 3 to 5 years, and some questions to ask yourself and your teams as you plan to respond to them:
How do you speak in a new way about strategy when an old language dominates the topic? This is a major obstacle standing in the way of thinking about strategy in a new way for a new world.
Jamie Dimon, CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase was quoted in Fortune (January 26, 2009) as saying, “I am shocked at the number of people who are still worrying about their strategic plan for 2009. We cancelled all that stuff – all of it”. That this is precisely the problem with strategic planning – due to the investment, in every sense, to the plan, we are reluctant to jettison it when required to do so. The response to situations that cry out for the abandonment of ‘the plan’ is to tweak, adjust and double our efforts. Invariably this merely results in digger our hole deeper and faster than ever. The global economic meltdown demanded a rethink of how we go about securing a competitive advantage, how we measure ourselves, what it is we need to be doing and why. Overnight the old rules of the game simply imploded and many were left clinging the ‘plan’, formulated in the context of the ‘old rules’ but now rendered as helpful as a toothpick in a gun fight.
The problem is, we have forgotten how to think. Reliance on our ability to plan, and specifically on Porter’s conventional wisdom as to how best to go about the formulation of that plan, has produced ‘lazy thinking’ habits within executive teams and amongst leaders. We have been so used to marching to a known tune, that when the tune changes, or the music stops altogether, we simply keep on marching in-step. The signs have been there for some time we merely ignored them: Inquisitiveness, questioning, learning, experimenting, reflecting, embracing diversity and paradox and conversations have all been neglected or worst still, intentionally sacrificed on the alter of expediency, efficiency, standard practice, tradition, conventional wisdom and known methodology.
The emergence of online social networks (Facebook, Twitter, blogs, etc) has profoundly impacted the way we communicate, associate and organise ourselves. It has left industries and companies grasping frantically for a response and a strategy that will allow them to seamlessly combine the world they know with a world that is fundamentally unfamiliar. Businesses need to explore the emerging shifts, changes and trends of this new world and create an approach that can be adopted in order to construct a meaningful and appropriate way forward to survive and thrive in this differently connected world.
The idea of social networking and communicating is not new. We have communicated through grunts and smoke signals, hand gestures and printing presses. We’ve been networking since we first spotted each other. It’s the mechanisms we use, the rules of engagement and value placed on our engagement that has changed with time. We all know the phrase “it’s not what you know, but who you know that matters”. It’s not a new concept or idea, its origin can probably be traced back to when we first realised we needed something from each other.
The emergence of these distinct and unique social networks is influenced by and influences the different generations of workers. Generational Theory can be a useful general filter to lay over social networking and these new forms of communication. This as generational theory focuses on the value systems or worldviews of individuals. And certainly as we look at the very different worlds the various generations have grown up in, both their value systems and worldviews differ when it comes to social interaction.
Jim Collins got it wrong. Not totally wrong, but wrong enough that we need to be careful (as always) about who we listen to when designing companies for future success. Too often, leaders take a shortcut and blindly apply models they find somewhere else, without doing the work to adapt it to their culture and context.
Jim Collins is, of course, the international superstar guru author of “Built to Last” (buy at Kalahari.net or Amazon.co.uk), “Good to Great” (buy at Kalahari.net or Amazon.co.uk) and most recently, “How the Mighty Fall” (buy at Kalahari.net or Amazon.co.uk). His first two books are the two best selling business books of all time. His latest is bound to follow suit.
I have to declare that I am not the wildest fan of Mr Collins. I have read too many reports from the research teams that have worked with/for him, and are very disgruntled at how he has used their work without giving them any credit. I also received my copy of “How the Mighty Fall” yesterday, and was amazed to turn to the back cover of the book and see a single quotation, made by none other than… Jim Collins. I’m still to read the book, but I wonder if “hubris” and “arrogance” are possible ingredients in how the mighty fall? (Certainly “humilty” was a key element of his “Level 5 Leadership” principle). I’ll say more on this at the end of this (long) post… (But, then again, maybe I’m just jealous).
That personal comment aside, though, the question nevertheless remains: Are the models Jim Collins presents worth following? This is especially important since two of his “Good to Great” companies have recently gone bankrupt, and on average the whole lot have performed WORSE than the general stock exchange index over the past year or so of the recession. Are the principles in Collins’ books eternal? Or do they belong to an era that no longer exists?
Seeing the world through your customer’s eyes – your key to growing your business By Dr Graeme Codrington
Entrepreneur Magazine, July 2009
In turbulent times such as these, only those companies that can prove they have real value to offer will survive. Yet, in tough times, most companies tend to focus more on their internal systems and processes than on what their customers are looking for. Seeing the world through your customer’s eyes is essential for success, especially during a downturn.
Whether or not you’re convinced by science and media reports on global warming, there is no doubt that our planet is under pressure at the moment. Things must change, and the governments of the world – not to mention increasingly vocal activists – have started to put pressure on companies and individuals to reduce energy usage and become more environmentally friendly and sustainable. Yet many businesses continue to ignore these issues, relegating it to a low priority task team, or simply paying lip service to it as a PR exercise. This is short sighted and potentially damaging. And it doesn’t make business sense, either.
There are significant advantages for the companies that take energy efficiency and business sustainability seriously. You don’t have to be a do-gooder to develop processes and systems to improve the environmental performance of your business. There is a strong business case for doing so.
Here are nine reasons why you should take these issues seriously, and see business improvement as a result. Doing well by doing good is possible. And desirable!
“Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all?” So goes the question embedded in the fanciful world of a children’s tale and a question that hauntingly stalks most of us for the remainder of our adult journey. Not that we would admit to such for over the years, not only have we learnt how to conceal and disguise the question, we have learnt to train the mirror into giving us the answer we wish to hear. Hearing the truth? Now that is real fantasy!
For those in leadership it is a question that provides the yardstick of measurement, recognition and reputation. With so much at stake, it is the question that demands the answer, “why of course, you are”- be that true or not.
The real problem is not the question but rather the expectation surrounding the answer. Perhaps it is the blatant denial or angry response to the answer – the one at least that fails to deliver the expected – that is in need of attention. And so, the mirror, weary of abuse and fearful of being shattered, has learnt to simply reply, “why of course, you are” every time the question is asked. … Continue Reading
My husband is gets really annoyed that I don’t put clothes back in my cupboard after I have worn them.I tend to pile them up on the table in our bedroom until I create a high pyramid of creased outfits.I have struggled to change this habit so, as a last resort, my husband playfully implemented a fining system.If he sees clothes on the table, he fines me 50p.
I have started changing my behaviour because it is now being measured.Dumping clothes now has a monetary value and it’s starting to hurt my pocket in a big way.
The moral of the story is this – sometimes the best way to encourage a certain focus or behavior in an organisation, is to measure it and attach a value to it.
Companies want to make money and increase the bottom line.Organisations are also gradually realising that, in today’s global economy, talented people can give them their competitive edge.Very few companies have married these two concepts.How do you use your talent to make more money for your organisation?
One of the effective way to create wealth from people and entrench talent development into the fabric of the organisation is to measure it.Use metrics that make people accountable for it.But, how?
Lowell Bryan and Claudia Joyce from McKinsey have an interesting proposition in their book ‘Mobilizing Minds’.Their idea, which will take time to implement, is the best way to measure return on talent that I have come across so far.
As the recession deepens, with customers dwindling and staff morale dropping, strong leadership is required. Too many companies, and the individuals in them, are falling into a trap of trying to keep their heads down and hoping the downturn ends soon. They’re trying to get away with doing what they’ve always done – but on a tight budget. They’re desperately hoping that wave after wave of cost cutting measures, while making no operational mistakes, will be enough.
But, this is no time for low cost business as usual. Equally, though, it’s not a time for panic or self-destructive short-term strategies. The world truly has gone mad, and sanity and reason seem to have fled. If companies want to survive this recession, and take advantage of the few opportunities it might provide, they have to be level headed and have a clear “downturn strategy” while focusing on a few key areas that can give them competitive advantage in rapidly shifting markets. This requires a new mindset with clear thinking and single-minded execution.
There seems to be too little of that going around at the moment. But the solutions are actually surprisingly simple.
Nelson’s Column is a monument in the centre of London’s Trafalgar Square. A 5.5 metre statue of Lord Horatio Nelson stands on top of a 46 metre granite column. Thousands of business people walk past it every day on the way to and from work. Few of these people realize that, even though he died over 200 years ago, Lord Nelson could teach them some valuable techniques that could help them and their companies innovate in today’s business world.
Lord Horatio Nelson is regarded as the greatest officer in the history of the British Royal Navy. He is renowned for his innovative, confident and unorthodox battle techniques. He died in 1805 after he and the British fleet annihilated their Franco-Spanish enemies in the Battle of Trafalgar. This battle was one of the most decisive naval battles in history and it established Great Britain as the leading naval power. After this humiliating defeat, Napoleon Bonaparte of France abandoned plans to invade Great Britain.
Innovation will give 21st century organizations competitive advantage. But, as Nelson showed, innovative and cutting edge ideas are not random. They come from relentless, focused preparation. Wisdom, experience and preparation provide the confidence to follow through with seemingly risky, unconventional ideas. … Continue Reading
Since I’ve been in any form of organization, no matter how big or small, there’s always been an attempt to make a distinction between managers and leaders. There are all kinds of definitions that attempt to make the distinction, like this one from Warren Bennis, “Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right things.” And for the most part they’ve done a great job convincing us of the difference.
May I suggest that the distinction between the two is not helpful in today’s business environment!
The lines between manager and leader have become very blurred. In this highly pressurised environment there just isn’t time to make the distinction any more. We’re thin on the ground. We need managers to lead and leaders to manage. Perhaps it’s time to scrap both these terms and come up with a new one. Of course that’s not going to happen. There’s too much money to be made by keeping them separate. Step outside of academia for a while and ask those on the ground whether they’re managers or leaders? Their answer is almost always both. And this is not because they’re not smart enough to understand the difference, it’s because today’s business environment requires them to do both and to be both.
Today, almost all of our work functions are highly documented. Is there a business function left in the world that doesn’t have a manual attached to it, showing in accurate detail, how to go about what it is you do whenever you’re doing it? With that much detail why do we need managers? Just follow the manual. Managers in the context of these manuals have become the go-to reference people. You go to your manager when you’re not sure how to interpret the manual, not because you don’t know what to do. … Continue Reading
Sharon is a skilled and experienced business professional having worked as MD at Old Mutual’s retail banking arm Nedbank. She is also a guest lecturer at INSEAD. We interviewed Sharon to ask her what she believes companies need to be doing as recession looms on the horizon … Continue Reading
“Baby Boomer”, “Generation X”, the “Millennial generation”, “Generation Y” – these and other similar terms to describe groups of people of different ages have become fairly well known and well used in recent years. These terms arise from a theory that attempts to explain how different generations develop different value systems, and the impact that this has on how younger and older people interact with the world around them and with each other.
This understanding of different generations and the “gap” between them has many applications in all areas of life, from parents interacting with children, to sales people selling to younger or older clients, to managers who work with teams of people of different ages.
The Accounting Profession: Power, Pressure, Perfection and People
Since 2002, the accounting profession has been rocked by sensational corporate scandals and subsequent strict regulations. The four largest global accounting firms (the ‘Big Four’) still have more challenges on the horizon. All of them see their talented staff as the best tool to embrace these challenges and add the value demanded by clients. Each of the Big Four believes their people are the source of their future competitive advantage.
But, most graduates who are recruited by these firms write the same exams, are affiliated to the same professional bodies and are overseen by the same external regulators. The structure of an audit, the deadlines, the type of people who are recruited, the pressure and the opportunities are similar at each of the four accounting giants.
If talented people are the key to differentiation for each of the firms, why and how should they change and structure themselves in order to capitalize on this critical resource? How can they each use their people to differentiate from each other?
In spite of the new networked, knowledge economy, increased regulations and changes to the profession, the organisational design and way audits are staffed and performed has generally remained the same.
“It is my contention that in the over 40 years that I have been associated with the JSE, South Africans have always over-reacted emotionally towards the exchange. When there is a bull market people believe it is never going to stop and when there is a bear market everyone believes that the sun will never shine again.” – Humphrey Borkum, Chairman JSE Limited.
This is not another comment on how tough it is out there. There’s plenty of that going around, and then some. This is rather a question on how one should prepare people for the ‘flip side’? And there always is a flip side, whether you’re running a company or flying an Apollo Mission.
There are clearly some difficult decisions to be made when resources are tight, cash flow is under pressure and business isn’t flowing in like it did 12 months ago. Of course it doesn’t help when you don’t know when the cycle is going to turn, how quickly and to what levels the economy will return? Making a bad decision when the pressure is turned up can have far reaching consequences. Containing costs and doing everything to keep sales to an acceptable level are all part of the mechanisms most managers turn to.
My youngest son Sipho arrived home from school the other day having just negotiated a history exam. “Well, how did it go?” I asked. Without so much as breaking his stride, he replied, “Well Dad, I either got 92% or 60%” and with that disappeared into his room leaving an empty and somewhat stunned silence in his wake.
I was left pondering his answer. Answer? What kind of answer was that anyway? I was left with two thoughts: Firstly, Sipho has a bright future in politics and secondly, he did a masterful job at managing parental expectations!
It was the second conclusion that led me to thinking about two of the most important aspects of leadership, namely the need to manage expectations and the need to manage perceptions. … Continue Reading
Barrie Bramley looks at the preoccupation many companies have with ‘talent’and the confusion it’s causing; as those who are grappling with it struggle to work out what to do with it? Barrie looks at the problem of scarce skills in the market place and the fact that when there’s a shortage of people with skills, you want to ensure that you ‘acquire’ the best people available. … Continue Reading
- First published in the April 2008, Mortgage Solutions magazine
The era in which you were born has an extraordinary effect on your value system, your expectations of the workplace and how you approach life. In this article, Dr Graeme Codrington, one of the world’s leading experts on generational theory, gives an introduction to the concept of the generation gap. … Continue Reading
Business world is facing the dawning of a new alliance age / revolution that will bring about a new business model more symbiotic and substantially different from the business model of today. The competitive and changing economic landscape demands a new business model…one removed from the shareholder value model to one where value for all stakeholders is created. A model where symbiosis is common place, a model where an entirely new set of rules, governances and structural design/architecture is created; a model that requires the mobilisation of every ounce of intelligence from the managers managing the relationships. In this article our UK & European Director, Dean van Leeuwen, shares with us the results from interviewing over 30 senior executive managers and undertaking a broader global research study of leading companies. The results are illuminating.
I received an email the other day inviting me to contribute a ‘thought’ or message to a leader newly appointed to the role of CEO. I was one of several people invited to do so and I thought it was a nice touch. Unfortunately, the mail arrived at a time when I was in Thailand on holiday (someone has to do it) and deliberately computerless. By the time I read the invitation, the deadline and opportunity to make a contribution had passed. Ah well, maybe next time.
But I got to think what it is I would have written and decided that this is the message that I would want a new CEO to hear…
KeithCoats – So, it is your first day in the corner office I received an email the other day inviting me to contribute a ‘thought’ or message to a leader newly appointed to the role of CEO. I was one of several people invited to do so and I thought it was a nice touch. Unfortunately, the mail arrived at a time when I was in Thailand on holiday (someone has to do it) and deliberately computerless. By the time I read the invitation, the deadline and opportunity to make a contribution had passed. Ah well, maybe next time. But I got to think what it is I would have written and decided that this is the message that I would want a new CEO to hear…Click here to read the rest of this article
DeanvanLeeuwen – Building Network Alliances – The future for profitability and success in turbulant times.
Business world is facing the dawning of a new alliance age / revolution that will bring about a new business model more symbiotic and substantially different from the business model of today. The competitive and changing economic landscape demands a new business model…one removed from the shareholder value model to one where value for all stakeholders is created. A model where symbiosis is common place, a model where an entirely new set of rules, governances and structural design/architecture is created; a model that requires the mobilisation of every ounce of intelligence from the managers managing the relationships. In this article our UK & European Director, Dean van Leeuwen, shares with us the results from interviewing over 30 senior executive managers and undertaking a broader global research study of leading companies. The results are illuminating.
GraemeCodrington – Introducing the Generations
The era in which you were born has an extraordinary effect on your value system, your expectations of the workplace and how you approach life. In this article, Dr Graeme Codrington, one of the world’s leading experts on generational theory, gives an introduction to the concept of the generation gap.
BarrieBramley – Talent – I dislike that word!
Barrie Bramley looks at the preoccupation many companies have with ‘talent’and the confusion it’s causing; as those who are grappling with it struggle to work out what to do with it? Barrie looks at the problem of scarce skills in the market place and the fact that when there’s a shortage of people with skills, you want to ensure that you ‘acquire’ the best people available.
GraemeCodrington – TomorrowToday.biz Building Capacity in London and Europe
Graeme Codrington moves to our UK branch in August this year. While not a permanent relocation, it’s expected that Graeme and his family will remain abroad for three to five-years. Already an internationally recognised expert on talent and the future of work, Graeme will continue to help organisations to understand global societal changes, and how these changes affect their staff, leaders and customers. While abroad, Graeme will periodically return to South Africa to honour requests from clients who wish to engage with him directly.
Dr Graeme Codrington offers insight for South Africans (and others) on how not to be left in the dark when it comes to strategic planning as well as attracting and retaining talented young people with creativity – particularly when traditional solutions aren’t working. Consider how you could use the current load shedding to your advantage!
Anthony Atala asks, “Can we grow organs instead of transplanting them?” His lab at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine is doing just that — engineering tissues and whole organs (bladders and, soon, kidneys) using smart bio-materials and cutting-edge techniques.
Watch his amazing short video on TED MED
Tweet This Post
The Great Recession has made CEOs rethink strategic planning. Walt Shill, head of the North American management consulting practice for Accenture believes that: “Strategy, as we knew it, is dead…Corporate clients decided that increased flexibility and accelerated decision making are much more important than simply predicting the future.”
In my my latest presentation Brave New [...]
In this months Harvard Business Review, Roger Martin writes that “modern capitalism can be broken down into two major eras. The first, managerial capitalism, began in 1932 and was defined by the then radical notion that firms ought to have professional management. The second, shareholder value capitalism, began in 1976. Its governing premise is that [...]
This weekend, Sky TV in the UK will become the first to broadcast a live sports event in 3-d. This is a preview of regular channel that will be launched by Sky in April. It will be available at no extra cost to anyone with an HD box.
Read the press release [...]
Recent Comments